(from del.icio.us)
(from del.icio.us)
As a bit of an aside from various posts I have in the works, I have an appointment with an optometrist this weekend. The last time I went to one was just shortly after I began working fulltime in front of a computer screen, around the summer of 2006, and the contacts that I wore at the time caused my eyes lots of trouble.
By trouble, I mean that my eyes would get red a lot, the lenses would move around more than they should, my eyes would produce lots of ’sleep’ (I’m not sure what the technical term for that gooey stuff is), and so on. My boss at the time always thought I had pink eye and would spray my keyboard with anti-bacterial sprays, so I gave up and got a pair of glasses that I’ve been wearing since then.
For a little bit more context, I began wearing contacts when I was eleven years old, and wore them until I was 23, so I do have a good bit of experience with the ways that they should work in a human eye.
Before these issues began, I was wearing Acuvue 2 lenses. I experimented with the Acuvue Oasys, which was somewhat worse, and in between the two Acuvue brands I also experimented with CIBA Vision’s Night & Day lenses, which were the worst of all.
In any case, I have been out of the loop with the current technology of contact lenses for a couple of years, and am wondering if there are any recent advances, perhaps even specifically for people who have experienced the issues that I have, who need computer friendly contact lenses. Certainly I plan to talk to the optometrist about this, but any other insights would be most welcome. Please feel free to comment.
(from del.icio.us)
(from del.icio.us)
Before I moved to Atlanta, I spent the last period of my residence in Lakeland, Florida as part of a house church. I feel blessed and privileged to have been a part of that community.
The interesting thing is what kind of responses I got back then, if I told someone that I was part of a house church. Essentially, these responses varied from, “Oh, you go to a Sunday evening Bible study. That’s great for you.” (with a warning to ensure that I wasn’t part of a cult) to “Oh, that’s great. My church has those, too. We just call them Sunday Schools small groups cell groups life groups house churches. Then, the church meets together on Sunday mornings.”
I’m sure you can catch the implication that is in both of these responses. I don’t necessarily believe that the respondents were intentionally trying to either reduce the community to a Bible study, or assume that they already understood what was going on because it went on in their churches. But I do believe that this is an issue that is worthy of consideration.
In the United States, there is a movement away from the building-based churches of the past 1,600+ years and toward smaller, less building-based churches that you could call house churches. George Barna believes that these churches (and their attendees), which are not housed in church buildings (whether they are cathedrals or shopping malls) will outnumber those that are housed in church buildings within just a decade or two.
Understand that we in the United States are behind the rest of the world in this trend, as the remnants of Christendom have stronger influence here than in other countries. As postmodernism and postcolonialism are two sides of the same coin, Christendom on the earth will hopefully have its days numbered.
You can read more about this in his book Revolution. These churches do not all necessarily meet in homes, as they might meet in bars, coffeeshops, nightclubs, or other neutral spaces. The main point is that they forgo the use of “religious spaces.”
A large percentage of these house churches, as my friend Brad Culver says, function in such a way that they try to transplant a traditional, building-based church into a home, or other space. So, this kind of church maintains an identical ecclesiology to the church on the corner. This is what we encounter when people believe that they already understand what a house church is, simply because their own church has small groups that meet in homes.
There is also a percentage, which I believe is probably growing, of house churches that function as a community of people that are angry with the traditional church. Many of these churches do have a genuine hunger to create something different for those who are angry, or hurt, or rejected by the traditional church, but because there is such a root of bitterness they will almost certainly be unsuccessful in truly finding the heart of God.
In alternative ministry, where my wife and I function, this is extremely common. You may be aware of the fact that alternative subcultures (punk, goth, metal, retro, etc.) are to a large extent rebellion against modern culture. They identified many of its shortcomings with incredible perception, and railed against them. In this sense, when they arose in the 60s and 70s, they were the first manifestation of postmodernism outside universities.
But because many of them, in their defining periods as subcultures, defined themselves by what they were against rather than what they were for, there is a potential for deep seeded anger and resentment (this is similar to the deep seeded anger and resentment that many Christians have for the secular world that they have railed against). Thus, when these subcultures are reached by the message of Jesus, they often retain their anger and resentment, and when the traditional church does not accept them in the way they function as a church or the way they function as people, this anger and resentment is turned against the traditional church as well.
Certainly, this kind of church, based on rebellion and bitterness, is not unique to alternative ministry or to the house church movement, and not all (or even most) alternative churches are characterized by this kind of foundation, but it is something against which these churches must intentionally guard themselves.
Finally, there are house churches that function as part of a genuine move of God that is happening in the earth. I want to again glean from the wisdom of Brad Culver, who calls his own community a “micro-missional faith community.” In this sense, he is able to define what his community is rather than having to defend what it is not.
In any case, these kind of communities have a beautiful potential for variety, and we can look at what they are like in another post.
(from del.icio.us)
(from del.icio.us)
(from del.icio.us)
WordPress has officially released version 2.6, with some nice changes.
In my various work and ministry endeavors, I have varying degrees of responsibility for several WordPress blogs (in addition to this one), and have thus upgraded several installations from 2.5.1 to 2.6.
Apparently, an issue that is at least relatively common in this particular upgrade experience is that, after upgrading, one is unable to log back in to the admin system. I encountered this issue in one of the upgrades I performed, and then saw it mentioned on Twitter.
In the hopes that anyone else who encounters the issue can resolve it quickly, here are the steps that worked for me:
http://sitename.com/wp-login.php?action=logout.So, if you run into this issue, try the above steps. Feel free to post comments, if it does or does not work for your installation.
While I’m thinking about WordPress upgrades, I’d like to put in a plug for some great ways to ease your upgrade experience.
First of all, I would be amiss if I did not recommend my current webhost, DreamHost. For as affordable as they are, they are a solid host with lots of freedom and even more disk space. In addition, if you use the promo code JSTEGALLBLOG, you will receive $25 off if you buy a year of hosting. If you host your WordPress blog with DreamHost, there is an easy one-click installation and upgrade process. Also, there are frequent backups in the event that something does go wrong.
If you do not host your blog at DreamHost, there are two plugins that can make your upgrade experience go much more smoothly.