Standards as a whole

Microsoft, especially in the last year or two, has made a lot of moves toward standards, web and otherwise. They announced the Interoperability Principles. They announced the ASP.NET MVC Framework, which finally allows programmers to control the HTML generated by ASP.NET. IE8 will pass Acid2, and any number of other things.

While I’m not optimistic that any of this will cause Microsoft to act in any unexpected ways with respect to its attempts to acquire Yahoo, it is clear that a shift is occurring, to whatever extent.

Noise from the web standards community

Advocates of web standards have made a lot of noise about the original decision, and it is clear that Microsoft listened. Many people made logical arguments for why IE8, especially from a long-term perspective, should not default to IE7 behavior, while understanding that the option for IE7 behavior was a good thing.

Legal issues

It’s entirely possible that this is partly related to Microsoft’s various legal troubles, and that they are trying to appear as a better business citizen to help their case.

Future versions of IE

I think one of the most significant benefits, both from the perspective of future versions of IE, as well as future versions of Firefox, Opera, Safari, etc., is that the need for version targeting will probably become much less because IE8 is the default behavior. People who create sites that break in IE8 will, certainly, have the option of targeting IE7, but in order to do that they’ll have to learn that they can.

Most people who will run into the issue will probably not have the interest (or the time, possibly) to find out this kind of solution. The ones who do find out about the solution will find out that Microsoft doesn’t see it as the ideal solution, and will probably feel at least some pressure to learn proper ways of doing things. Thus, in a few years, it is entirely possible that versions of Internet Explorer that follow version 8 will be met with a majority of sites that do not break.

That’s not to say that the majority of sites will follow web standards. I’ve seen innumerable websites that didn’t break when IE7 came out, because they had such disregard for web standards that none of the changes affected them. I suspect we’ll have to deal with this for a long time. But that’s fine with me, as the future of web browsers can continue to look forward.

IE8 has been significantly enhanced, and was designed with great support for current Internet standards. This is evidenced by the fact that even in its first beta, IE8 correctly renders the popular test known as 'Acid2,' which was created by the Web community to promote real-world interoperability,” said Ray Ozzie, Microsoft chief software architect. “Our initial plan had been to use IE7-compatible behavior as the default setting for IE8, to minimize potential impact on the world's existing Web sites. We have now decided to make our most current standards-based mode the default in IE8.

The web standards world has been abuzz for the last few weeks, following the announcement that Internet Explorer 8 (and, presumably, any number of future releases) would have the default behavior of rendering websites in the same way that Internet Explorer 7 does. Causing the browser’s behavior to advance would have required that designers and developers direct it to do so with a meta tag.

Many standards-aware designers and developers were very understanding of the decision to allow websites to target IE7, avoiding issues with badly-programmed websites that break when browsers move forward. However, many of these designers and developers made a lot of noise wishing that Microsoft would allow the default behavior of websites to advance as the browser does, and require those who want to target IE7 to read a little bit and find out about the meta tag.

Apparently, Microsoft listened to the noise. I’m amazed and pleased by this change in strategy. I hope they will be able to spread the word enough, so that websites that will break with IE8′s improved standards support will learn about their options (1. learn how to write standards-compliant code, 2. include a one-line meta tag). I feel pretty confident that this is unrealistic, but I hope that it will happen to the extent that Microsoft doesn’t have to go back on this decision.

Today, I found this tutorial on exactly that. Some of the dialogs are different than Leopard’s, but it is fairly easy to configure both on the Windows side and the Mac side. Note that the RedMon software required the use of a mirror site to download it.

Anyway. She can now happily print to my desktop from her laptop, when it is running Windows. My next related project will be attempting to understand how she can print to my desktop when it is running Ubuntu. Any advice is, of course, most appreciated.

Update: Using this tutorial, I was able to use the MacBook to print to my Ubuntu desktop. The configuration was much easier than it was for Mac to Windows printing.

There were many rumors of this kind of thing happening at various times in 2007. John Gruber had this post in May, which is worth a read.

…I'm delighted to tell you that on Wednesday, December 12, Internet Explorer correctly rendered the Acid2 page in IE8 standards mode. While supporting the features tested in Acid2 is important for many reasons, it is just one of several milestones for the interoperability, standards compliance, and backwards compatibility that we're committed to for this release. We will blog more on these topics.

Wonderful news. Web designers and developers everywhere agree with me that IE6 is the bane of our existence. There’s no need to discuss this further. IE7 is a massive improvement, and in general I’m pleased with the direction that the team seems to be taking for the future.

Acid2 compliance is, for me, an unexpected leap forward. Currently, Opera and Safari are the most widely used browsers that have achieved this milestone. Firefox 2.x does not reach this level, although Firefox 3 (which is in beta and, I’m sure, will be released well before IE 8 is) does.

I find this exciting. I have not been a fan of ASP.NET, due to the horrible HTML that it generates, and my lack of knowledge about how to separate the various parts of an application to have more control over the HTML. Evidently, this new system will give me that kind of control. I’m totally impressed by that.

As annoying as some of Microsoft’s projects can be with regard to standards and such things, I don’t envy the variety of developers that they have to try to please. They have to try to please the hardcore programmers that don’t care about the front end at all, and they have to try to please the designers who are really picky about the front end. Hopefully, this will help.

At this point, I can’t wait to see how Adobe and Microsoft will compete over these similar programs and technologies. I’ve never experienced a season in web technology like this, where two companies are essentially vying for the attention of designers and developers.

I think often about the choice between .Net, PHP, Rails, ColdFusion, etc. as I try to figure out where my career will head, and I’m beginning to think that these next few months will help me decide. Adobe is going to do amazing things with Apollo, and with Flex, and of course Creative Suite 3, and I think they’ll also do some awesome things with ColdFusion in its next release. Microsoft, though, is showing that they’ll do awesome things with .Net, Silverlight, and the Expression Studio/Visual Studio combination.

So on that note, I hope to learn a lot about these various things in the next few months, and make an intelligent decision. It would be easier to make one based on emotions. “Microsoft sucks. Use Adobe.” “Adobe sucks. Use GIMP and Ajax and LAMP.” And so on. Everyone can make arguments based on emotions.

The struggle is in figuring out what the best decision is, and how it lines up with the core of who I am and what I want to accomplish.