<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ★ GM, Rick Wagoner, and the bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanstegall.com/2009/03/29/gm-rick-wagoner-and-the-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanstegall.com/2009/03/29/gm-rick-wagoner-and-the-bailout/</link>
	<description>culture, design, spirituality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:53:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://jonathanstegall.com/2009/03/29/gm-rick-wagoner-and-the-bailout/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanstegall.com/?p=1354#comment-944</guid>
		<description>He also accomplished a great many things that led to the company&#039;s failure. Certainly enough to be fired, if one goes by the typical reasons that CEOs get fired.

I&#039;m not really saying that the federal government should or shouldn&#039;t call shots in the auto industry; just that SINCE they bailed out the auto industry, they have the right to call whatever shots they want. Otherwise, it shouldn&#039;t be bailing them out at all. This is obviously at least as bad an option as bailing them out though, and there are people who could advocate for both sides - I&#039;m just asking for consistency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He also accomplished a great many things that led to the company&#8217;s failure. Certainly enough to be fired, if one goes by the typical reasons that CEOs get fired.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really saying that the federal government should or shouldn&#8217;t call shots in the auto industry; just that SINCE they bailed out the auto industry, they have the right to call whatever shots they want. Otherwise, it shouldn&#8217;t be bailing them out at all. This is obviously at least as bad an option as bailing them out though, and there are people who could advocate for both sides &#8211; I&#8217;m just asking for consistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dad</title>
		<link>http://jonathanstegall.com/2009/03/29/gm-rick-wagoner-and-the-bailout/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanstegall.com/?p=1354#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Beg to differ a bit, o learned one as I posted last night. Wagoner had accomplished  quite a bit, i.e. for one thing reducing the work force by half. He was replaced by an existing GM guy. And why did you want the federal government calling the shots in the auto industry as they largely do in public ed? Still, much room for debate I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beg to differ a bit, o learned one as I posted last night. Wagoner had accomplished  quite a bit, i.e. for one thing reducing the work force by half. He was replaced by an existing GM guy. And why did you want the federal government calling the shots in the auto industry as they largely do in public ed? Still, much room for debate I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

